As a people, we tend to group ourselves into tribes or communities that accept our foibles and issues and often reflect them. Perhaps no place is more representative of this fact than high school. The reason: everything falls into simple, neat categories and the real action takes place when someone tries to stray outside the natural groupings or when two groups intersect.
In business, there are tribes or communities as well. You have finance types, marketing types and sales types, for example. These tribes are social among themselves, share the same language and experiences, and look at the other tribes or communities with suspicion or disdain. We have the Six Sigma types, the manufacturing types, the legal team and so on. And for the most part, we work in small, homogeneous teams with little intermixing.
In business, all groups (the executives, the finance team, the marketers, the pr team and the manufacturing team) fall into a group that could be compared with some of the groups in the high schools, for example the manufacturing team with the nerds. But, it is not the same with the innovators. That's because an innovator, like a prophet, is never accepted, even in his own community. Innovators are trying to change the status quo, and don't accept or don't play along with the established norms or expected behavior. So innovators are often at the periphery of their community. Unfortunately, innovators often don't flock well together either. While they share common tools, methods and perspectives, they often have very different timeframes and expectations for success. So it's rare to find a healthy innovation community, because some of the natural tensions exist (I'm a finance guy, what am I doing here?) as well as outcome tensions exist (you want to disrupt my line of business?) so innovators don't make the best community members. That's not to say they shouldn't try. Innovators should form tribes or communities within organizations and should reinforce each other, it is often simply hard to do that. An innovator from finance and an innovator from marketing and an innovator from manufacturing are already outsiders in their own rights, since they've been attempting to upset the established order. They don't share similar backgrounds or education, or roles or priorities, so bonding is tough.
Being an internal innovator in a firm that doesn't value or appreciate innovators can be a lonely life. No wonder innovation is so difficult and so rare, and requires a person with commitment and vision. It takes a lot of guts to demand disruptive change from a comfortable corporate culture, to look beyond the 3 month timeframe that most of your compatriots are fixated on. You, the innovator, are a disrupter, a berserker, often right and rarely supported.
But every once in a while, everyone in class will be glad you were there with the bright idea that saved the day.